What was the individual's action to resolve inefficiency in their group project?

• A. Decided to work alone to avoid conflicts
• B. Assigned responsibilities based on individual strengths
• C. Proposed a new project timeline
• D. Recommended that everyone contribute equally

Answer: (B)

Assigning responsibilities based on individual strengths is an effective way to resolve inefficiencies in a group project because it ensures that each team member is working in an area where they are most skilled and competent. This tailored approach not only maximizes the productivity of the group by utilizing each member's strengths but also fosters a sense of ownership and accountability. When people are assigned tasks that align with their abilities, they are more likely to be engaged, produce quality work, and collaborate effectively. This strategy enhances overall team dynamics and can lead to more successful project outcomes.

In contrast, working alone to avoid conflicts might create further inefficiencies as it can limit collaboration and idea exchange. Proposing a new project timeline may not directly address the underlying issues of inefficiency, while recommending equal contributions can overlook individual capabilities and lead to uneven workloads among team members. Therefore, the decision to assign tasks based on strengths directly targets the root of inefficiency by optimizing how the team works together.